07/31/08

USPTO Reviews Outsourcing of Patent Prosecution in "Scope of Foreign Filing Licenses"

02:35:38 am, Categories: In the News  

The USPTO recently issued a notice regarding the outsourcing of patent prosecution work to foreign countries. It has become a hot topic in numerous IP blogs as bloggers speculate whether this notice ends patent outsourcing. To educate our clients and other interested parties, we’ve written a formal response explaining how the notice impacts the current patent prosecution work outsourced to India. A copy of it is below:

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) recently issued a Notice in the Federal Register (Vol. 73, No. 142/Wednesday, July 23, 2008/Notices) titled, “Scope of Foreign Filing Licenses.” The Notice is directed toward the export of subject matter pursuant to a license from the USPTO.

The Notice reminds applicants and registered patent practitioners that the export of subject matter pursuant to a license from the USPTO is limited to the filing of foreign patent applications. More as a reiteration than a departure from existing law or regulations, the Notice serves as a reminder that exporting of subject matter for any purpose other than the filing of foreign patent applications (post a foreign filing license from the USPTO), requires obtaining the appropriate clearance from the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Department of Commerce.

The Notice does not purport to change or adversely affect the export of subject matter to, for example, an LPO. To the contrary, it addresses any doubts or confusion in connection with such an export. Stating it succinctly, export of any subject matter that does not require an export license is unaffected by the Notice.

The foregoing is in accordance with the Export Administration Regulations promulgated by the Bureau of Industry and Security that governs exports of various commodities, software and technology. Indeed, the Notice ends by stating that it “does not change existing law or regulations.” We agree.

Permalink 299 words by David Perla Email , 734 views • Send feedback

Comments, Pingbacks:

No Comments/Pingbacks for this post yet...

This post has 2 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Previous post: Privilege Process Lessons from Victor StanleyNext post: ABA Blesses Use of Legal Outsourcing – August ABA Ethics Opinion Confirms that Offshoring Legal Work is Ethical

November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

PANGEA3 LLC

Exclusive Participant of the General Counsel Roundtable's Preferred Pricing Program

#1 Legal Process Outsourcing (LPO) Provider - Brown & Wilson's Black Book of Outsourcing, 2007

Market Leadership Award - Legal Process Outsourcing - Frost & Sullivan, 2006

Search

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 229

Syndicate this blog XML Feeds

What is this?

powered by
b2evolution